Armed Forces Blog

Blog assignment: Write a brief entry on your blog explaining a)whether or not you believe armed force is justifiable in conflicts/survival situations and b)why or why not. Explain the circumstances you believe would warrant using violence to settle disputes or protect yourself or others.

 I think that the use of armed forces id justifiable if they are used to protect a person's rights or self defense. Like for example, if we were to intervene in countries that use child soldiers against there wills. Or if you are going to be killed or harmed by someone you should be able to fight back. I think this because human lives are at stake. Human lives are protected under the law and therefore it is lawful to use armed forces to protect them.

City Pre-War for the Jewish Photo Project

This is Bamberg, Germany. It is located in Bavaria. Recent numbers put Bamberg at about 70,000 people total but in the year 1990 (pre-holocaustish) the number for just the Jewish population was about 1,000. Life was nice and pleasant for those of the Jewish denomination. They had been living in Bamberg since before the First Crusade. However, during the holocaust that number plummeted and the fate of all but 17 people were ruined. Bamberg was just another city to be purged of Jewish influence and because of that idea hundreds of Jew were sent to their deaths. The numbers have since been brought back up but they we never forget.

Jewish Comparison Photo Project

http://idamclient.ushmm.org/IMAGES/(S(lzcbsavfo21swh4530225h55))/RetrieveAsset.aspx?instance=IDAM_USHMM&qfactor=2&width=640&height=480&crop=0&size=1&type=asset&id=1175974

In the first picture is a couple of Jewish kids from Bamberg, Germany living their normal lives. We can say that because they are smiling freely back to back and are dressed up and enjoying themselves with a curtain background, like in a home. In the second photo is my two older sisters and me dressed up for Halloween. In the background there is a commotion and a large room indicating a party of some sort is the setting. In both pictures there is a sense of unity and fun. Both pictures involve costumes and are not profile photos. They are similar also in that they are very natural, loving, and family oriented. However, they are different in background, number of people,  ages of people, and of course costumes. Both show normal and ordinary lives and how to protect them we can not allow genocide (injustice) to go unchecked, because it can destroy this happy picture in a matter of minutes.

Rapael Lemkin Connection Questions

1 The answer Lemkin received from his professor reflected the state of international
law in the beginning of the twentieth century: back then there were no laws that gave
states authority to intervene in the internal affairs of other nations. To do so would
undermine the idea of sovereignty, that is, the right of every nation to conduct its
internal affairs independently. What limits would you set on a nation’s sovereignty?
When should the international community impose laws on other countries?

The limit should be when the majority of people are suffering, like if even just 1 or .1 in the percent of poverty is over 50%. We should draw a line when the government is not doing its job right. Then we should impose laws to protect the people of the world.

2. Lemkin wondered, “Why is the killing of a million a lesser crime than the killing
of a single individual?”  What can be done to stop nations that turn against their
own people?








Creating a law or in his case a word to define what it is to commit an act of mass murder against a group of people with the intent to inhalation.

3. Lemkin was outraged when he heard that the mass murder of the Armenians went
unpunished. How could he turn his moral outrage into action? What could he do?


He could talk to people who could make a difference, people with "power" in the international world about getting justice for these people. Getting meetings or just drawing attention to the issue in general.

4. Without a court to judge the perpetrators, what options did the Armenians have
after the genocide?

They could have just quietly assassinated the perpetrators or banished them or just done something to make sure they would never hurt anyone again.

New York Times + Armenian Genocide: Guided Reading Questions

1. What do you think is meant by the phrases: "Newspaper of Record" and "All the News That's Fit to Print?"

 I think it means that the newspaper wrote about every little thing that happened making a chronological record of when and how things happened. The second phrase, I think it means that the newspaper writes about only things that will sell and and is up to snuff with how good they think they are as a newspaper company.

2. What could have been the benefits of the the New York Times covering the Armenian Genocide and the earlier massacres for the Armenians?

It show proof that the people were aware of what was going on in the world around them and show that we could put together a timeline based on dates and numbers of events to make a timeline of the genocide.

 

3. Who invented the term "genocide?" Why is creating a word to describe such events important?

A Mr. Raphael Lempkin. It is important to describe a genocide so that we know when it is happening again and because we know it has a pattern so we can observe and stop it or maybe even prevent it from going to far.

4. Why would the New York Times shy away from the use of the word "genocide"when discussing the Armenian Case?

New York Times people didn't know too much about the Armenian Case anymore and  also because the Turkish government refuses to admit to the Armenian Genocide  and threatened the U.S. to not say anything about it or Turkish cooperation might be difficult.

5. At the end of the reading Keller, the executive editor of the New York Times, said he was not qualified to make the determination of whether or not the Armenian Case was genocide. What type of people could Keller turn to help determine this? Why?

 He could turn to himself. He doesn't need someone to come baby him and tell him because at this day and age we have so much information at our finger tips that he could just look it up, do some serious research and come up with his own conclusion. People are biased so he needs to find the facts and interpret them for himself.

Genocide Experience Blog

Cristina Vilches

October 25, 2012

Period 3

Write a couple sentences describing this person, including his or her name and what the person looks like, what they've included about their past, etc.

·         Her name is Kristine Hagopian and she looks very old with a bump on her nose and her face tilted right and down but her eyes are pointing up. This tells me that she wants to look down but she can’t, she just can’t. Her story is about how her father was sexually assaulted by some Turkish soldiers and how her family was forced to watch. This led to her father’s eventual suicide.

·         His name is Sam Kadorian. He is very old He is looking up with partially open eyes and a furrowed brow. His mouth is open like he is trying to whisper something. His story is about how some Turkish gendarmes hurt him in the neck and piled dead bodies on him but how he couldn't cry out or he would die.

-Speculate as to what the person might be feeling based on their picture and their story.

·         I think she is feel the fear and anger and remorse of that moment, that she is remembering the pain and wants to look away, but it is not now, it is in the present so she won’t look away. She looks worn and yet her eyes say how very passionate she can still be and how vigilant she is.

·         His face says how he remembers pain the pain he was in. He looks like he is a child looking at their parents after something bad has happened, like at any moment he might break down and cry. He seems like he is trying to say something but he can not. He looks lost in the dark. Frightened. 

-Finally, imagine and write about what you think may have happened to this person after the story he/she tells, what questions does he/she leave unanswered? Use contextual clues from his or her picture to help you speculate (i.e. do they have anything that distinguishes their previous occupation? Are their hands folded in a certain way?)

·         She escaped and didn't get killed because she is alive as says that she escaped with her family but her father died. She has fancy clothes or rather a pattern on her clothing so she might be very well off now.

·         He probably got saved or he might have escaped the country but he was not killed, his grandmother might have though.